Appeals court rules against Trump on DACA immigrant policy

Appeals court rules against Trump on DACA immigrant policy

AP-US–Trump Immigration-Legal Challenge,3rd Ld-Writethru
By SUDHIN THANAWALA ,  Associated Press
Eds: New approach. Minor edits. With AP Photo.
SAN FRANCISCO (AP) — A U.S. appeals court blocked President Donald Trump on Thursday from immediately ending an Obama-era program shielding young immigrants from deportation, saying the administration’s decision was arbitrary because it was based on a flawed legal theory.

A three-judge panel of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals unanimously kept a preliminary injunction in place against Trump’s decision to phase out the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program.

Lawsuits by California and others challenging the administration’s decision will continue in federal court while the injunction remains in place.

The U.S. Supreme Court could eventually decide the fate of DACA, which has protected some 700,000 people who were brought to the U.S. illegally as children or came with families that overstayed visas.

In Thursday’s ruling, 9th Circuit Judge Kim Wardlaw said California and other plaintiffs were likely to succeed with their claim that the decision to end it was arbitrary and capricious.

She said the court was not trying to infringe on the president’s power to enforce immigration law but wanted to enable the exercise of that authority “in a manner that is free from legal misconceptions and is democratically accountable to the public.”

The Trump administration has said it moved to end the program last year because Texas and other states threatened to sue, raising the prospect of a chaotic end to DACA.

An email to the U.S. Department of Justice was not immediately returned.

Trump’s decision to end DACA prompted lawsuits across the nation, including one by California. A judge overseeing that lawsuit and four others ruled against the administration and reinstated the program in January.

U.S. District Judge William Alsup rejected the argument that then-President Barack Obama had exceeded his power in creating DACA and said the Trump administration failed to consider the disruption that ending the program would cause.

The administration then asked the 9th Circuit to throw out Alsup’s ruling.

During a hearing in May, Deputy Assistant Attorney General Hashim Mooppan argued that the courts could not review the administration’s decision to end DACA and defended the move against assertions that it was arbitrary and capricious.

“It’s a question of an agency saying, ‘We’re not going to have a policy that might well be illegal,'” Mooppan told the judges. “That is a perfectly rational thing to do.”

Mooppan said the administration was under no obligation to consider the fact that people had come to rely on DACA.

The judges on the 9th Circuit panel appeared skeptical of the argument that the DACA decision was beyond the court’s authority to review.

Wardlaw noted at the previous hearing that another appeals court had reviewed a similar Obama administration immigration policy.

Judge Jacqueline Nguyen questioned the government’s contention that a DACA decision was beyond the authority of the court. She also disagreed with the argument that DACA isn’t legal.

The administration has been critical of the 9th Circuit and took the unusual step of trying to sidestep it and have the California DACA cases heard directly by the U.S. Supreme Court. The high court in February declined to do so.

Federal judges in New York and Washington also have ruled against Trump on DACA.

18 Replies to “Appeals court rules against Trump on DACA immigrant policy”

  1. 186674 758255 I discovered your weblog web site on google and check a couple of of your early posts. Continue to keep up the extremely very good operate. I just additional up your RSS feed to my MSN News Reader. Seeking forward to reading far more from you later on! 150784

  2. 830410 838568There is noticeably a lot to know about this. I believe you created some good points in attributes also. 954104

  3. 248781 168917Hey this is kinda of off subject but I was wanting to know if blogs use WYSIWYG editors or if you need to manually code with HTML. Im starting a blog soon but have no coding experience so I wanted to get advice from someone with experience. Any assist would be greatly appreciated! 748017

  4. Wardlaw noted at the previous hearing that another appeals court had reviewed a similar Obama administration immigration policy.

  5. 644018 332607This design is spectacular! You naturally know how to maintain a reader amused. Between your wit and your videos, I was almost moved to start my own weblog (properly, almostHaHa!) Wonderful job. I genuinely enjoyed what you had to say, and a lot more than that, how you presented it. Too cool! 498446

  6. 1284 318941I genuinely enjoyed this. It was extremely educational and beneficial. I will return to examine on upcoming posts 591027

  7. 275889 471809But, what about the conclusion? Are you positive in regards to the supply? 17708

  8. 799057 140565Wow! This can be one particular of the most helpful blogs We have ever arrive across on this topic. Actually Wonderful. Im also an expert in this topic so I can realize your hard work. 818536

  9. 927802 374318Wonderful weblog here! Also your site loads up rapidly! What host are you using? Can I get your affiliate link to your host? I wish my internet site loaded up as fast as yours lol 350967

  10. 313618 736156you use a great weblog here! do you need to make some invite posts on my blog? 391317

  11. 660108 694965The urge to gamble is so universal and its practice so pleasurable, that I assume it should be evil. – Heywood Broun 714997

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Top